Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Trademarks
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Manual of Style/Trademarks page. |
|
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17Auto-archiving period: 3 months ![]() |
![]() | This project page does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
Notice of discussion
[edit]Editors are invited to comment at WP:Village_pump_(idea_lab)#Could_MOS:TMRULES_be_amended_to_avoid_conflict_with_WP:COMMONNAME,_esp_for_contemporary_artists_and_their_works? Schazjmd (talk) 17:39, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
Discussion at Talk:Pnau § Pnau and PNAU
[edit] You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Pnau § Pnau and PNAU. -- Marchjuly (talk) 08:10, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
Requested move at Talk:Xkcd#Requested move 29 March 2025
[edit]
There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Xkcd#Requested move 29 March 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. FaviFake (talk) 16:38, 29 March 2025 (UTC)
The General rules section is too messy
[edit]I believe the section Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Trademarks#General_rules to be very confusing in its current state. I think it should be reformatted into a table, or more distinct sections. It feels like a bunch of different rules stuck together. FaviFake (talk) 10:05, 30 March 2025 (UTC)
- No. It was more clear before your changes. – The Grid (talk) 18:57, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
- Well, I changed nothing in the way the content is displayed. Do you think it would be better formatted as distinct sections, or as a table, or something else? FaviFake (talk) 19:14, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
- I would wait until the discussions with xkcd are closed. – The Grid (talk) 14:54, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
- ...is that a yes? The ongoing discussion on xkcd is not about the formatting of a MOS page, it's about a policy issue. I'm not suggesting we change the guidelines. FaviFake (talk) 15:23, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
- It's a no because you're still changing a page that's relevant to the discussion. – The Grid (talk) 15:37, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
- Oh nono I wasn't going to reformat it myself, I never wanted to. I created this section to ask other people if they agreed and wanted to do it themselves FaviFake (talk) 16:00, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
- It's a no because you're still changing a page that's relevant to the discussion. – The Grid (talk) 15:37, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
- ...is that a yes? The ongoing discussion on xkcd is not about the formatting of a MOS page, it's about a policy issue. I'm not suggesting we change the guidelines. FaviFake (talk) 15:23, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
- I would wait until the discussions with xkcd are closed. – The Grid (talk) 14:54, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
- Well, I changed nothing in the way the content is displayed. Do you think it would be better formatted as distinct sections, or as a table, or something else? FaviFake (talk) 19:14, 2 April 2025 (UTC)