Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Trademarks

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Notice of discussion

[edit]

Editors are invited to comment at WP:Village_pump_(idea_lab)#Could_MOS:TMRULES_be_amended_to_avoid_conflict_with_WP:COMMONNAME,_esp_for_contemporary_artists_and_their_works? Schazjmd (talk) 17:39, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Pnau § Pnau and PNAU. -- Marchjuly (talk) 08:10, 18 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Xkcd#Requested move 29 March 2025 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. FaviFake (talk) 16:38, 29 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The General rules section is too messy

[edit]

I believe the section Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Trademarks#General_rules to be very confusing in its current state. I think it should be reformatted into a table, or more distinct sections. It feels like a bunch of different rules stuck together. FaviFake (talk) 10:05, 30 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

No. It was more clear before your changes. – The Grid (talk) 18:57, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I changed nothing in the way the content is displayed. Do you think it would be better formatted as distinct sections, or as a table, or something else? FaviFake (talk) 19:14, 2 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I would wait until the discussions with xkcd are closed. – The Grid (talk) 14:54, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
...is that a yes? The ongoing discussion on xkcd is not about the formatting of a MOS page, it's about a policy issue. I'm not suggesting we change the guidelines. FaviFake (talk) 15:23, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
It's a no because you're still changing a page that's relevant to the discussion. – The Grid (talk) 15:37, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oh nono I wasn't going to reformat it myself, I never wanted to. I created this section to ask other people if they agreed and wanted to do it themselves FaviFake (talk) 16:00, 3 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]