Template talk:Infobox video game
![]() | Template:Infobox video game is permanently protected from editing because it is a heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use {{edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Usually, any contributor may edit the template's documentation to add usage notes or categories.
Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. Functionality of the template can be checked using test cases. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Infobox video game template. |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 60 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
Designer / Producer infobox parameter fields
[edit]I have a question in regards to the designer/producer designer infobox parameter fields. What if there is one lead designer/programmer, and the rest are just designers/programmers; should one exceed in crediting more than 3 people for those fields? I bring 3 up specifically since the rule only applies to the artists/writers as no more than 3 people should be credited.-Prince Silversaddle (talk) 15:51, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
- Status quo is to only list leads or directors in the respective fields. IceWelder [✉] 17:15, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
- It's not just status quo, it's clearly explained by the documentation to do it this way. ~ Dissident93 (talk) 20:08, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
End of service parameter field proposal
[edit]I'd like to propose this field, especially with the growing mobile game/live service game environment. I do think it would help give context to exactly how long a game was active for readers at a glance, and could also be useful for instances where service for one region of a game was discontinued before others. Calling it "End of service" would also bypass the concern raised in regards to a "Discontinued" parameter, as it's more direct to the point and less likely to be misconstrued. Kung Fu Man (talk) 14:34, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
- I wonder if we should include some indicator that a game is live service, likely as part of the Mode line, as that would also help enforce this to be limited to games considered live service. Masem (t) 14:53, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
- Like a y/n flag within the infobox? ~ Dissident93 (talk) 18:48, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
- I'm not sure, I dont like the idea of devoting just a single like to indicating a live service game or not. I can't think of a live service game that does not have MP eleements, which is why I'm thinking there (eg "Multiplayer (live service)", but I'm not 100% sure on that. Masem (t) 18:55, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
- Well Pikmin Finder is one example of a non-multiplayer game that was EoS'd, and it's actually the reason I suggested this parameter when it was brought up in the discord. I feel the text alone should give an indication as to what it means to the point it shouldn't need the additional validator to keep it in line. At worst, maybe a bit of reminder text on the template instructions just in the fringe event someone does misunderstand it.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 03:46, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
- I'm not sure, I dont like the idea of devoting just a single like to indicating a live service game or not. I can't think of a live service game that does not have MP eleements, which is why I'm thinking there (eg "Multiplayer (live service)", but I'm not 100% sure on that. Masem (t) 18:55, 2 March 2025 (UTC)
- Like a y/n flag within the infobox? ~ Dissident93 (talk) 18:48, 2 March 2025 (UTC)